Software that frees the floor from check calls and data entry.

That is the job. AI voice runs pickup, transit, and delivery check calls and logs status to the load. Tenders become structured loads in your TMS without re-keying. FreightScout is overlay on the TMS you already run, not a new system of record. You keep the judgment. The repetitive work comes off the floor.

They are fair point-tool or TMS buys for that search. FreightScout is overlay: AI voice check calls and tender-to-load work is logged by API where one exists, and by reading the TMS in place where it doesn't, so the floor does not re-key. Compare on a demo, not a scorecard.

A browser teammate is aimed at carrier procurement. A managed team runs post-rate-con work inside your systems. FreightScout is one product covering the whole load: win, price, move, bill, keep, with an autonomy dial from approve-every-move to autopilot. Read the sourced pages: Compare options and Compare options.

No. It exposes the performance gap that was already there. Your A players get the research, the data entry, the follow ups and the check calls off their plate, and they run away with it. The reps whose whole value was the repetitive work have a harder conversation coming, but that conversation was coming anyway. The goal is not getting people fired. The goal is you don't have to make the next ten hires.

You don't rip anything out. FreightScout sits on your TMS and inbox and reads them as they are, so day one nothing in your stack has to be unwound. Keep your CRM if you want; most floors find it stops getting opened, because the work shows up here already done and the record keeps itself current. Walking away from the old license later is deleting a bill, not running a migration.

Every draft is grounded in your own loads, lanes and margins, and it cites the datapoint behind every claim. It writes in your voice, negotiates up to your ceiling, and going above it needs a human yes, and until you flip a task to autopilot, nothing leaves without a human yes. If it does not have the figure, it says so rather than producing one.

Your data stays yours, scoped to your tenant. It is never shown to any other customer. Our SOC 2 audit is under contract with Oneleet. Ask on the demo and we'll walk you through our current security posture.

The sales side runs in production today on live freight. The execution side runs supervised at a working brokerage right now, every action staged for a human yes before it goes to autopilot. The product views on this page are illustrative and use sample data; none of them is a picture of something that does not exist yet.

We used to sell them as two products. That was our org chart on your screen, so we killed it. One product, one login, one price. If you were quoted the old structure, the new one is simpler, ask us.

No. Works on top of the TMS you already run, by API where one exists, and by reading the TMS in place where it doesn't. It reads and writes there where you grant access. Build, Cover, Track and Bill are all live, supervised. Booking and outreach are supervised by default and switchable to autopilot. No rip and replace, no migration project, and if you're mid migration it doesn't touch that work.

$1,500 a month for the platform with three seats in it, and $349 a month for every seat after that. People who only sell take a Sales seat at $79 a month. The platform works a load in four stages, Build, Cover, Track and Bill, each earned on its own. Per-load pricing is covered on the demo with Connor. A load never re-bills for reschedules or amendments. Same rates at every size, no volume tiers. Pay the year up front and get two months free on the platform and seats. Same terms for every floor. The numbers are on the pricing page, not behind a demo.