Blog

How to Move More Loads Per Rep Without Hiring

By Connor Miller, Founder and CEO, FreightScout. Last updated 21 October 2026.

Short answer: you don't get more loads out of a rep by asking them to work faster. You get more loads by taking the work off their desk that never needed a rep in the first place. Re-keying tenders. Dialing healthy trucks for a status. Chasing PODs so you can bill. Every hour a rep spends there is an hour they're not covering freight or talking to a shipper.

In a brokerage you only grow profit two ways: more margin per load or more loads. Margin moves with the market. Loads per rep is the one you can actually work on.

Why do reps top out?

Walk your floor at 2 PM and watch what people are doing. Not what their title says. What their hands are doing.

I spent twelve years in freight and helped scale an agency into nine figures. On every floor I've seen, the good reps weren't capped by talent. They were capped by the stuff that piles up around each load:

A tender lands as an email or a PDF, and somebody types it into the TMS line by line.
A truck gets booked, and somebody re-keys the carrier, the rate and the rate con.
A load's in transit, and somebody dials the driver at pickup, in transit and at delivery, even when nothing's wrong.
A POD comes in, or doesn't, and somebody chases it before the invoice can go out.

None of that's selling. None of it is covering a hard load. It's just the cost of each load existing, and it scales one to one with volume. Add more freight and the typing and dialing grow right along with it. That's why "we need to hire" shows up right when things start going well.

Isn't hiring the normal answer?

It's the normal answer. It's also the slow one.

A new rep takes a while to get useful, eats a senior rep's time while they learn, and shows up on payroll whether the freight does or not. If the market softens, you've got a seat you can't fill with loads. And the new person spends a big chunk of their day doing the same re-keying and dialing as everybody else, so you've bought more of the same bottleneck.

Hiring makes sense when you need more judgment on the floor: more relationships, more people who can save a load that's on fire. It doesn't make sense as a way to buy more data entry.

Where should you start?

Start with the jobs that are high volume, low judgment, and happen on every single load. On most floors that's four:

Where the hours go	What the rep does today	What should take it
Data entry	Types the tender into the TMS	Software that reads the email, PDF or EDI and builds the load
Carrier calls	Calls, vets, haggles, books, re-keys	Software that vets, negotiates up to your ceiling and writes the booking back
Check calls	Dials every truck at pickup, transit and delivery	AI voice that dials, logs the note on the load and escalates the exceptions
Invoicing	Chases the POD, builds and sends the bill	Software that takes the POD in and runs the invoice and collections

Pick the one that hurts most on your floor. Don't try to fix all four on day one. For a lot of brokerages it's check calls, because they're constant and they interrupt everything else. For others it's tenders coming in faster than ops can key them.

What should a rep still own?

This part matters, because if you get it wrong your best people will fight the change, and they'll be right to.

A rep should keep the work that needs a freight person:

The relationship. The shipper call, the carrier you've used for years, the close.
The yes on a messy load. Bad refs, split stops, a rate that doesn't match. A person should look before that commits.
Anything above your buy ceiling. Software can negotiate, but going over the number you set should need a human.
The exception that's already on fire. Detention, a mechanical, a shipper who's hot. That's where a good rep earns their seat.

The goal isn't fewer reps. It's more freight per rep, with your A-players spending their day on the work that only they can do. If anything, taking the busywork away shows you who your A-players are a lot faster.

How do you do it without ripping out the TMS?

You don't rip it out. The TMS is where your floor lives, where your history is, and where accounting pulls from. Any tool that asks you to migrate before it saves you an hour is asking you to take a big risk for a maybe.

What you want is software that works on the TMS you already run, whether that's McLeod, Aljex, Tai or something else, and writes the result back onto the load so your team sees it where they already look. With FreightScout that connection is set up by API where the TMS offers one, and by reading it in place where it doesn't, set up during implementation. The TMS stays the system of record.

The test is simple. After the software touches a load, open the load in your TMS. Is the work there? The load built, the carrier and rate written back, the check call note logged, the invoice sent? If your rep still has to copy anything over, you haven't taken the work off their desk. You've moved it.

How do you keep control while you hand work over?

Start supervised. Every brokerage I know is nervous about software touching live freight, and they should be. Your margin and your customer pay for it when it goes wrong.

FreightScout runs on a dial you control, per team and per action. On day one most teams keep everything on approve: the software drafts and stages, and a person says yes. As you watch it handle real loads, you flip the low-risk, high-volume work to run on its own and keep the judgment calls with your people. Booking and outreach stay supervised by default until you switch them. Every action is logged and reversible, and you can turn any piece off without breaking the rest.

That's how trust gets earned on a floor. Not in a demo. On your own freight, one job at a time.

How will you know it's working?

Don't trust a vendor's hours-saved number, including ours. We don't publish one, because we haven't measured it across enough floors to stand behind it. Measure it on your own floor instead:

Before you start, count loads per rep per week for a few weeks. Use your own TMS numbers.
Write down where the day goes. Ask reps to tally re-keying, check calls and POD chasing for one normal week. It doesn't have to be perfect.
Turn on one job, supervised, and leave the rest alone so you can see what changed.
Recount after a month. Same reps, same kind of freight.
Ask the reps what they did with the time. If the answer is "covered more loads" or "called more shippers," it's working. If it's "approved a lot of stuff," tune the dial.

What does FreightScout take off the floor?

FreightScout is built by a broker, not a software company. It's an AI execution layer that works the load on the TMS you already run. It's not a TMS and not a load board. Four agents, all live and supervised:

Build turns an EDI, email or PDF tender into a load on your TMS, so the floor doesn't re-key it.
Cover vets the carrier, negotiates up to your max pay and never above it, and logs the booking back.
Track places pickup, transit and delivery check calls with AI voice, writes the note on the load, and escalates the exceptions.
Bill takes the paperwork in and runs invoicing and collections.

The full breakdown of where rep hours go and which agent takes them is on the more loads per rep page, and the controls are on autonomy and trust.

FAQ

How do freight brokers move more loads per rep without hiring?

Take the repetitive work off the rep's desk: tender data entry, routine carrier calls, healthy-load check calls and invoicing. Let software do those on the TMS you already run, supervised at first, and keep reps on relationships, tough loads and exceptions.

Which job should a brokerage automate first?

The one that eats the most rep time on your floor. For many brokerages that's check calls, since they happen on every load and interrupt everything else. For others it's tender entry. Start with one, supervised, and measure it before adding the next.

Do I have to change my TMS to do this?

No. FreightScout works on the TMS you already run, including McLeod, Aljex and Tai. By API where the TMS offers one, and by reading it in place where it doesn't, set up during implementation. The TMS stays the system of record.

Will this replace my reps?

That's not the point of it. The goal is more freight per rep. Reps keep the relationships, the yes on messy loads, anything above your buy ceiling, and the exceptions. The software takes the typing and the routine dialing.

Can the AI book a carrier on its own?

It can, if you let it. Cover negotiates up to the max pay you set and never above it. Booking runs supervised by default, so a person approves the truck, and you can switch it to run on its own per team and per action.

How much time will we save?

We don't publish an hours-saved figure, because we haven't measured one across enough floors to stand behind it. Count loads per rep before and after on your own floor. That's the number that matters.

Is FreightScout a TMS or a load board?

Neither. It's an AI execution layer that sits on the TMS you already run and does the work on the load: build, cover, track and bill.

Book a demo: watch FreightScout build, cover, track and bill a load on the TMS you already run, and see the row it writes back. Book a demo

All posts: the blog index.